LETTERS POSTAL DEVILS EATING CDS?
develop is the most exciting piece of regular mail I get after Japanese animation
laserdiscs. I joyfully received Issue 11 but unfortunately the wolverines in the Postal
Service dined on some of the plastic and no CD was to be found! Help!
-- Jim Perry
Would you consider mailing develop in a nonperforated plastic wrapping? The
perforation was two- thirds torn when I received it.
-- Eva Schlesinger
I really enjoy develop , but I have to say that I've enjoyed it less recently. Some time
ago the CDs came in a small envelope well protected inside the magazine, and
everything was fine. Now, develop is shipped with the CD in its own holder, which
would seem to be a fabulous idea except that you were blind-sided by the U.S. Post
Office. Every month since the CD got its own holder, the Post Office has mangled my
plastic bag, CD holder, and magazine. Today my develop issue 11 arrived sans CD. I
called the subscription office (1-800-545-9364) and they promise to send me
another within four weeks.(!?) Growl.
-- Bob Cent
Most of the mail I get is, unfortunately, on this subject. Our Production Manager,
Hartley Lesser, really has been working on it. Even with Issue 11, we took a small
step toward solving the problem: since many people thought someone was breaking
open the package and stealing the CD, we inserted a thick sheet of paper over the CD so
that it wouldn't be visible. But complaints of torn packaging still came in, so clearly
the packaging just wasn't sturdy enough. The packaging around Issue 12 and its CD
should be about twice as thick as before and have no perforation. If that doesn't work
we'll try something else.
Issue 7 was the last one to list the 800 number you used to contact the subscription
office (though it stubbornly has still shown up on our renewal notice). The correct
number is 1-800-877-5548. The person you spoke to normally doesn't handle calls
regarding develop and didn't know that replacement CDs should be mailed within a day
or two of notification of the problem. Sorry for the mixup. We hope you'll never need
that service again!
-- Caroline Rose
SCREENWRITING CAVEAT
Your Issue 11 column on drawing to the screen was really useful to me. I had an
animation program that wrote directly to the screen and it worked fine. But when I
upgraded to a new accelerator card my program kept crashing. I spent months trying to
figure out the problem. But your article fixed it straight away. All I needed was the
SwapMMUMode calls. I don't know why the previous card didn't require them, but my
program works fine now.
-- Tony Cooper
Thanks for your interest in the column. We're glad it was helpful to you. One thing we
want to be sure to mention is that writing directly to the screen will break for sure on
future Macintosh systems based on RISC technology. And we again want to stress that
the only applications that should even consider writing directly to the screen are
games and other animation programs.
-- Brigham Stevens and Bill Guschwan
USER-FRIENDLY RENEWING
Recently I received a couple of renewal notices for develop in the mail. In trying to
decipher these notices, I realized that user friendliness is something we should all be
aiming for not just in thesoftware we write, but in everything we do. It's interesting
how working with the Macintosh makes one aware of human interface issues in
everyday life. Anyway, I think there are a few ways in which the develop renewal
notices could be made more user friendly:
--Tim Hammett
We're in the process of making the changes you suggested to the develop renewal
notice.
We're also correcting the 800 phone number on the notice, to 1-800-877-5548.
Thanks for your letter. Without it, I would have assumed that the renewal notice
(which isn't really in my domain) was in great shape. I appreciate the enlightenment.
--Caroline Rose
REUSED CDS: IS IT ART?
In Issue 10 of develop , Bruce Radford stated that he wasn't sure what to do with his old
CDs. He felt that he should recycle them, but he wasn't sure how. Well, I have a
suggestion.
Many people forget that reusing something is often even better than straight recycling.
My school would have many uses for old issues of the develop CD. I know a few friends
who would love copies, no matter how old; I could use them in a programming class;
and other students could cut them up to make jewelry for school fundraisers. I also
have many uses for old 256K SIMMs, which seem to be becoming about as useful as
pennies now.
So go ahead and send the stuff that you think no one needs to me, or to a school near you.
-- Peter Bierman (age 16)
BS Software
5757 Olentangy Blvd.
Worthington, OH 43085
Thanks for the idea. Day care centers and children's museums have also been mentioned
as possible destinations for old CDs. We suggest that before giving away CDs for for art
projects, developers put a deep scratch through the data side of the CD if it contains
any confidential or licensed data. For some wild and crazy ideas on this from Apple's
Developer Support Center, see the Q & A on page 126.
-- Caroline Rose
DEVELOP INTERNET ADDRESS
I'm on the Internet and develop contains only AppleLink addresses. I'm guessing that
crose@applelink.apple.com is your Internet address. develop really should have an
Internet address for academic developers to send e-mail to.
-- Eric Kofoid
Adding "applelink.apple.com" to any AppleLink address converts it to an Internet
address. The Internet addresses for me and develop's Technical Editor Dave Johnson
are listed on the last page of every issue.
-- Caroline Rose
BACK ISSUES CONUNDRUM
I noticed that your back issues are listed at $13 in develop and at $10 in the APDA
catalog. Why the discrepancy? Who should I order the back issues from?
-- Michael Tackie
P.S. Great magazine. Very technical. I don't understand everything, but that's good; it
forces me to become a better programmer.
You pay a $3 shipping charge when you order from APDA, so it adds up to $13 in the
end.
-- Caroline Rose P.S. Thanks!
The "Apple Event Objects and You" article in develop Issue 10 contains two errors in
the printed sample code. The first problem is that five lines were omitted from the end
of GetWindowIndex. The code at the top of page 25 should be changed from
return noErr; }
to
if ((rawIndex> numWindows)||(rawIndex<= 0)) {
*index = 0;
return errAENoSuchObject;
} else
*index = rawIndex;
return noErr
}
The second bug is in the routine WriteRectToken (page 30). The following call
BlockMove(*thisRectDesc.dataHandle,
&tokenPtr->theRect,sizeof(Rect));
should be changed to
BlockMove(*thisRectDesc.dataHandle,
(Ptr)tokenPtr->theRect,sizeof(Rect));
Since theRect is actually a pointer to a rectangle (see the declaration at the top of page
29), the first version would have destroyed the pointer and four bytes of the following
long integer.
Thanks to Doug McKenna, the author of Resorcerer, for pointing out these problems.
WHY DON'T YOU WRITE MORE OFTEN?We welcome timely letters to the editors,
especially from readers reacting to articles that we publish in develop . Letters
should be addressed to Caroline Rose (or, if technical develop -related questions, to
Dave Johnson) at Apple Computer, Inc., 20525 Mariani Avenue, M/S 75-2B,
Cupertino, CA 95014 (AppleLink CROSE or JOHNSON.DK). All letters shouldinclude
your name and company name as well as your address and phone number. Letters may
be excerpted or edited for clarity (or to make them say what we wish they did). *